714. The Big Difference Between Intrinsically Childfree Women And Childfree Men
A frequent topic discussed in groups or forums of childfree people is the difficulty to find a childfree partner.
While all childfree people are different from more average people, unfortunately the biological differences between the genders seem to be more pronounced in the childfree than in instotypicals. (I call those people, whose instinctivity suffices to facilitate the survival of the species, instotypicals. Thus, all instotypicals are breeders, but being a breeder does not make someone automatically an instotypical)
A frequent topic discussed in groups or forums of childfree people is the difficulty to find a childfree partner.
While all childfree people are different from more average people, unfortunately the biological differences between the genders seem to be more pronounced in the childfree than in instotypicals. (I call those people, whose instinctivity suffices to facilitate the survival of the species, instotypicals. Thus, all instotypicals are breeders, but being a breeder does not make someone automatically an instotypical)
The following is about intrinsically childfree people by inclination, not about breeders manqué including those by political considerations.
1. Instotypical women (IW) are driven by an instinctive urge to breed. Breeding is a function of their body, it requires no use of the brain. Animals are breeding successfully, unless they have become extinct.
Therefore IWs identify with their body, their focus of self-improvement is upon the body, their self-worth depends upon their looks. They consider their body as an asset, the improvement of their looks as an investment to find the man with good genes to sire healthy offspring and the man, who can provide for them. For IW, they are often not the same.
Once IW have children, they become not only emotionally attached to them but even addicted to care for them.
One consequence is their willingness to accept self-sacrifice, which could even be called self-abuse. They choose the agony of giving birth, health risks, plus dull, unpleasant, abhorrent and annoying activities for years. By accepting the chores of not only regular cleaning but even the changing of stinking diapers, they make themselves the slaves of selfish, very incompetent and irrational beings, who for many years remain unfit for any intellectually rewarding interaction. IW accept to be the slaves of pre-human beings, which are more like animals.
Once they have made these pre-human beings the significant center of their life, once the father is legally bound to pay, the IW often looses interest in the person of the man. For her, he has become a purse, a bank account, a handyman, a taxi driver.
2. Instotypical men (IM) are driven by an instinctive urge to sire. As the breeding outcome thereof cannot be predicted, the recurrent dishomeostasis does not depend on the breeding success. The instinctive urge to sire is an urge to have as many offspring with as many healthy women as are available, it does not imply any attachment to the women nor any inclination to take part in raising the brood. If an IM does, it is the price he is willing to pay to be subscribed to the recurrent access to the same woman's body. Some men prefer this over the repeated hunting for new victims for siring attempts.
3. A childfree woman (CFW), who is not a breeder manqué, is this by lacking the breeding instinct. This makes a lot of the body focused behavior of the IW obsolete or at least unimportant. To find a companion to share cultural and intellectual activities, a woman needs other traits and qualities than good looks.
It is the absence of the dominant instinctivity, which allows childfree women to recognize breeding as an unnecessary burden to refuse it.
4. In contrast to the CFW, childfree men (CFM) cannot be explained or defined by the absence of a breeding instinct, which even male breeders do not have. For any man, being the provider of children adds a heavy burden upon his life, especially if the number of the children restricts the mother to be only a housewife. Wishing to avoid as much as possible of the stress of the professional rat race, and additionally disliking the deficit of benefits from being with a woman, who is an overburdened mother, is independent of the magnitude of a man's instinctivity.
Therefore remaining childfree and finding a CFW is an expression of a general male wish to avoid for himself the disadvantages of raising children.
This leads to a sad discrepancy:
The CFW want men, who appreciate their non-physical, cognitive qualities. But many CFM are attracted by the same siring instinct to the same female breeders as had been those, who have succumbed to breeding. While they remain CFM, they feel an urge to sire, yet they want the guaranty of no success. They just do not want to be themselves involved in breeding.
CFM feel inclined to strive for the same stupid attributes of masculinity, like fitness, muscles, strength, ambition, success, assets, competition. Thus they appear attractive to the provider seeking breeders, whom they do not want. They are ignorant, that what attracts breeders often does not interest or even repulse the CFW. They know nothing except their own struggle with their own siring instinct. They are not aware, that only the absence of the breeding instinct makes women really CFW.
CFW have a problem finding a suitable match. CFM are oblivious of what distinguishes CFW from wanna-be breeders, what CFW need and want and how to recognize those truly not afflicted by the breeding instinct. CFM often get involved with breeders temporarily in the skin of a CFW.
