Additional Thoughts About Defining Jerks
Entry 391 may be a bit misleading in that what I meant as defining as a specific kind of a jerk could appear as if I consider this as the only kind of a jerk.
So here is the more general definition:
A jerk is a man,
- whose behavior or attitude causes a woman harm, pain, discomfort, annoyance
- who does not improve his behavior in spite of getting feedback
Personally, I am not worried about those jerks, who are capable to understand, what an individual woman wants and who take it for serious in the choice of their victim. They read my profile and/or this blog and they know that they better keep away from me, because I am clearly not the type of a woman to be easy prey.
When they are unaware or in denial of their problem, and the problem is not immediately obvious, then they are a hazard to me.
But I am worried about those jerks,
- who do not take for serious, what a woman wants, no matter how explicitly she declares it, and who sometimes are not even bothered to read it
or - who do not understand clear and unequivocal statements in my blog or profiles
and
- who are sincerely convinced to offer me what I want and to be able to give me, what I need.
When they are unaware or in denial of their problem, and the problem is not immediately obvious, then they are a hazard to me.
